Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Neuro-Oncology ; 23(SUPPL 6):vi113-vi114, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1634179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a rapid conversion from in-person to video-visits for new patient consultations and follow-up visits. Now with available vaccines and declining case rates efforts are underway to return to in-person visits as they provide more revenue and are viewed as best for patients and clinicians. This reviews these assumptions. METHODS: Electronic medical records from seven full-time faculty neuro-oncologists at Johns Hopkins Hospitals were retrospectively reviewed from 4/1/20 to 3/31/21 to examine the use of video visits over time and their patient demographics. RESULTS: From 4/1/20 to 3/31/21, 279 new patients were seen (57% video-visits) with a median age of 52 years for both video and in-person visits. Patients came from 15 states for video and 17 states for in-person visits. There were also 2247 follow-up visits (85% video-visits) with a median age of 47 yrs for video and 50 yrs for in-person visits. Patients came from 28 states for video and 14 for in-person visits. No show visits were more frequent for in-person visits. During early months of the pandemic, few patients were seen in the clinics. Thereafter, video-visits rose sharply comprising 93% of follow-up visits in June 2020 and 62% of new patient consultations in September 2020. These rates have remained high (in March 2021, 72% of all follow-up visits and 59% of new patient consultations). CONCLUSIONS: Despite reductions in COVID-19 infection rates, our neuro-oncologists continue to favor video-visits for new patient consultations and follow-up visits. Video-visits save patients and caregivers travel time, parking costs, and time away from work. They also allow an acceptable history and neurological exam, participation by many family members, easy sharing of MRI scans and laboratory data, and discussions unencumbered by face masks and shields. These advantages to videovisits remain significant even as the pandemic recedes.

2.
Neuro-Oncology ; 23(SUPPL 6):vi111, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1637005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Neurology Institute and Society for Neuro-Oncology recommend multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) meetings as a quality metric in neuro-oncology. With the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in travel restrictions, we expanded our existing MTB by transitioning to a virtual format that maintained our commitment to providing consultation for primary CNS tumor cases. This transition permitted participation by neuro-oncology teams from over 30 Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative (BTTC)/National Cancer Institute-Comprehensive Oncology Network Evaluating Rare CNS Tumors (NCI-CONNECT) centers across the United States. Here, we describe results from opening our MTB remotely to these teams. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from remote MTB meetings held between April 2020 and March 2021. To gauge the impact of our MTB on clinical management, we administered a brief survey querying BTTC members. RESULTS: Twenty-eight providers presented 41 cases during 24 virtual MTB meetings (range: 1-4 cases per meeting). Two cases (5%) were presented only for educational value. Approximately half (54%) of the cases discussed dealt with diagnosis/management of an NCI-CONNECT rare CNS tumor. During MTB discussions of the 39 cases seeking diagnosis/management recommendations, 32% received clinical trial recommendations, 10% were suggested to enroll in the NCI Neuro-Oncology Branch (NOB) Natural History Study (NCT02851706), 17% received a recommendation to obtain central neuropathology review, and 100% received recommendations for further disease management. Most BTTC survey respondents (83%) found these recommendations impactful in the management/treatment of their presented case or generally useful/ informative for their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: We describe the feasibility and utility of an innovative virtual multi-institutional MTB. These novel remote meetings allowed for discussion of complex neuro-oncology cases and recommendations from experts, particularly important for those with rare CNS tumors. Our study's findings during the COVID-19 pandemic of the value of providing remote access to MTBs should apply postpandemic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL